Matthijs de Ligt: The Leader

“Erik ten Hag shaped the early stages of my career, so he knows how to get the best out of me and I cannot wait to work with him again. I know what it takes to succeed at the highest level, and I’m determined to continue that record at this special club.”

These were the words from Matthijs de Ligt on August 14th, 2024 when Manchester United confirmed the capture of the Dutchman. De Ligt comes with pedigree. At the age of 25, he has won the league title in three countries with Ajax, Juventus and Bayern Munich. A Kopa Trophy and Golden Boy winner, he has made 324 club appearances and has 45 international caps.

But is he still at the peak of his powers after numerous club moves, not playing under a consistent manager and going through some injury issues in recent times?

In this report, I will rate every trait of De Ligt after scouting him thoroughly across many games for Bayern Munich. It will be similar in structure to my previous report on Leny Yoro.
Let’s get into it!

Scout report

NOTE: In all the example gifs in this article, De Ligt is wearing #4 for Bayern and usually playing as the right-sided CB in the backline.

  1. Defending

I’m going to break the aspects of defending into five distinct parts. In each part, I’ll explain the trait I am measuring, show some examples of it via match footage and then rate De Ligt on that trait.

1A) Pressing

I am defining all forward defending actions as pressing. In a nutshell, any action where De Ligt has to step up the pitch to engage is counted here.

De Ligt has a good sense of timing when it comes to pressing actions. He’s often able to sneak up on his man and press forward to win the ball from then before they can turn and run at him.

De Ligt wants to avoid a 1v1 where the attacker dribbles at him (we will see why later) and has therefore developed a good sense of stepping up to avoid giving them this room. Even if they are able to get a touch, he uses his physical presence and upper body strength to destabilise them before they can dribble at him.


This also extends to situations where the attacker has to collect at an angle or awkward body shape. That slight hesitancy is enough for De Ligt to barge in and win the ball. His sense of timing combined with his power make him a consistent winner when he gets it right.

There are situations where he is over-eager to avoid an attacker turning or simply gets done by a very good first touch or turn. De Ligt’s slight lack of agility goes against him here

The situations where an attacker has turned and is running at him will be covered in the ground duels section.

Regarding his pressing, another con is that De Ligt doesn’t press very often. He’s not a natural stopper like Sergio Ramos or Cristian Romero. He tends to mix aggressive actions with passive actions. His awareness of his lack of top-end agility to deal with opponents that can turn him is one reason he doesn’t press regularly. That coupled with the above con of getting turned at times are the reasons I cut some marks.

Pressing: 6/10

1B) Box defending

I am defining all backward or deep defending actions as box defending. Actions where the CB has to drop deep close to his box to engage or defend while tracking back.are covered here. I’m also including the cover play actions of positioning and sweeping behind the line in this section.

Let’s start with the good bits. De Ligt has very good awareness in the box. He gets good interceptions and clearances because he is a good reader of danger when deep in his box and doesn’t have to cover much distance to engage which he does cleanly and quickly with consistency.

Might sound odd, but De Ligt gets an unreal amount of blocks in his box. I’ve seen a lot of footage and he just seems to always be in the right position to block shots. A combination of his large body and technique to make himself bigger (without conceding hand-balls) and his good reading of the game, this highlights De Ligt’s excellent reactive instincts.

The main issue for this section comes when it comes to backward running in space. If De Ligt is isolated or has to deal with cutting a pass or dribble while running towards his goal, he can be beaten. This isn’t to say that he’s slow, but his acceleration and agility cap his ability to keep up with faster players. Here’s Dortmund’s Adeyemi burning past De Ligt and scoring even though the latter read the situation well and ran as fast as he could.

In summary of this section, I like De Ligt’s box defending instincts. He guarantees a presence which mixed with his great positioning and awareness make him a monster for interceptions, clearances and blocks in the box. It’s reverse running situations in space where he is susceptible. Overall, still good.

Box defending : 8/10

1C) Channel defending

I am defining all sideways or wide defending actions as channel defending. Actions where the CB has to drift sideways to engage or defend while tracking an opponent on the wing.are covered here. This often happens when the fullback steps up and the opponent player attacks that space, so it is also related to playing in a high line and high press setup.

Closely related to what we discussed at the end of the previous section, De Ligt is aware of his weakness when running alongside a fast attacker and this situation shows up in channel defending as well. De Ligt’s go to move is to ….. avoid channel defending. I’ve noticed in many situations where he could have gone wide to engage, De Ligt displays his passive nature by dropping towards goal and cutting the eventual path or buying time for a teammate to come out and help him (usually the fullback on that side).

This is a clip that follows Adeyemi’s goal from the same game vs Dortmund. This time De Ligt knows he has teammates recovering and just charts his path to his own goal instead of drifting wide.

Another sequence where De Ligt delays engagement in a bid to not get dribbled past on the wing. Once he has his fullback close enough for pressure and the attacker has reached the byline, De Ligt approaches to sandwich the opponent before it leads to something dangerous. Good awareness of one’s limitations.

On the rare occasions De Ligt knows he has the position advantage on his man or is facing a slower attacker, he is able to engage wide and win his duel. He defends channels rarely but when he does he comes out on top.

In summary of the channel defending section, De Ligt isn’t really good at it and doesn’t really engage wide as a result of not wanting to get beaten on the wing. His go-to move is to delay for backup. But the good news is that he has good decision-making and positioning to pick his moments and ensure he doesn’t give away a big opportunity.

Channel defending : 5/10

1D) Aerial duels

More self-explanatory section, I am defining all duels with an opponent in the air as an aerial duel. Basically, a header contest. I’ll also be covering uncontested headers and attacking headers in this section. I won’t be covering aerials in any other section.

De Ligt is strong aerially. Standing at 1.89m, his tall frame multiplied by his broad physique make him a towering presence in the air. He has averaged an aerial win % of 60-65% for most of his career which usually puts him in the top 20 percentile of the league.

There are times his lack of jump means he gets beaten or is only able to muster a low-powered looping clearance. This is the reason for him not being in the top 5 percentile for aerial win % (like Harry Maguire).

This shows up more clearly in open play when defending vertical long balls because the duellers have space to charge their jump instead of a quick vertical jump. I’d say that it’s less of an issue in set pieces since there is only time to jump vertically from a standing start which suits De Ligt. The run-and-jump situations in open play are where De Ligt can be beaten coz of his lack of agility and spring.

Overall, De Ligt is a great aerial dueller. He isn’t elite since his lack of jump prevents him from gaining 65+% aerial win % and at times results in loose clearances especially in open play. But those are small gaps. 

Aerial defending : 8/10

1E) Ground duels

I am defining all duels with an opponent on the ground as a ground duel. Basically, a classic isolated 1v1. This often occurs in transitions versus opponent dribblers running at the CB or when the high line has been breached to isolate an opponent attacker vs CB.

You can also consider it as the next step of the pressing stages we discussed. What happens when an attacker is able to turn and run at De Ligt? I cover that here.

Let’s start with the good parts. Even when being run at, De Ligt’s positioning, awareness and odd knack of getting his body into good areas to intercept or tackle prove valuable.

An extension of channel defending, when De Ligt does decide to engage wide, because he has chosen the right window to trap his marker on the sideline, he is able to come out strong in a ground duel. Again, his timing and decision to engage is key here. He doesn’t often give into the aggressive side of himself.

In fact I’d say his duels in wide areas are a lot more reliable than anywhere else. He is able to limit the space and two-way opportunity for a dribbler by sandwiching him to the touchline. 

Now for the not-so-good parts. De Ligt’s turning speed is an issue. Which is why dribblers with quick feet that force him to shift weight quickly often get the better of him. Here’s an introductory clip into this issue. De Ligt can almost be toyed with.

This makes him very reliant on getting the first tackle attempt correct because he can rarely recover from a lunge to turn his body and engage again. Most dribblers can twist the other way and progress.

The issue is that it is simply a physical limitation because De Ligt’s positioning, timing and body usage are all good. There are many moments where he gets all of this correctly and is still beaten by a pair of quick feet..

In deeper areas, this becomes a bigger issue since a quick dribble can put De Ligt on the ground if his first attempt fails which provides an easy path for the opponent.

On some occasions, De Ligt is able to recognize his mistake after having committed to the duel and is forced to concede a foul. The classic take-one-for-the-team. Expect to see this happen when we are defending transitions and he can’t rely on recovery of others.

In summary, De Ligt has some major issues in ground duels. Once an opponent has a run at him it gets very tough for De Ligt to keep up and turn and move as quickly as any decent dribbling forward. He tries to make up by limiting such situations to the flanks, or winning the ball early with a well-timed lunge, but those are easier said than done. This is a clear gap.

Ground duels: 4/10

That concludes our defending section. Here’s a snapshot of De Ligt’s scorecard so far.

  1. Passing

In modern football, a center-back’s abilities on the ball are as important as off it. Especially, for a top team that is expected to keep the ball more often than not and break down opponent blocks regularly. In this section, I will analyse De Ligt’s passing traits.

2A) Pass security

Let’s start with the basics. Is the CB a secure passer? Is he able to handle many passes and ensure they safely reach their target? Does he ensure possession security in the build up phase of his team? Does he position himself in a good area to receive to help his team protect the ball and keep moves going?

De Ligt looks good for most of these questions. He has the reliability and security of a seasoned veteran and keeps things simple and safe. I find that he makes a lot of passes to his goalkeeper to restart build up in a game. 

His other usual safe pass route is the short slip to the DM. This is seen lesser (I’ll explain why in the short progression section) but it’s still something he exercises when opponent pressure in the centre of midfield is low

In conclusion, I don’t find any issues in this section. The reason I’ve cut 2 marks is related to the next two sections, so I’ll explain myself there.

Pass Security : 8/10

2B) Pass empathy

“Passing the ball is communicating with another person; it’s being in the service of another person. It’s crucial. For the pass to be a good one, the player has to put himself in the position of the person who’s going to receive it. It’s an act of intelligence and generosity, what I call technical empathy.” — Arsene Wenger.

The above serves as a good definition of pass empathy. Is the power, speed, spin and direction of your pass putting your teammates in good positions for their next action?

In De Ligt’s case I find his technique of passing very good. He usually lands crisp passes weighted well to find his teammate. One complaint I have of him is more mental than technical. I feel often that De Ligt passes to the feet of his teammates or even a conservative step behind to secure possession. He rarely plays it in the space ahead of a teammate to encourage a dribble or run. Perhaps, De Ligt’s cautious mentality shows in his pass empathy as well.

Pass Empathy: 7/10

2C) Short pass progression

A progressive pass is a forward pass that attempts to advance a team significantly closer to the opponent’s goal. Different stats providers have different ways to measure this stat. 


Anyone visiting fbref will notice that De Ligt’s progressive passes stat is in the top 10 percentile, insinuating that he’s highly progressive. In this section and the next, I will look to debunk that claim by splitting progression into 2 parts – short and long progression. The former deals with how De Ligt progresses using short grounded passes.

From the stat, you would think that De Ligt attempts a high number of central line-breaking passes, but this couldn’t be further from the truth. De Ligt’s go-to progressive pass is the safe down-the-line pass to the same side fullback. These passes usually start just inside De Ligt’s half and venture into the opponent half to be counted as progressive on paper but actually rarely progress the game or can be called line-breaking. They are also made when never under pressure.

He does this a few times every game and is something he is comfortable with. Obviously, they still count as progression, but the sheer volume of these passes colour that stat in a certain way and hide the fact that De Ligt simply doesn’t attempt passes that aid central progression through the opponent block.

Even his favourite pass isn’t always on lock. This is where the pass empathy issues comes in. De Ligt’s tendency to stray on the slower or backwards side sometimes makes his passes readable. A stronger pass on his teammate’s front foot could have avoided the interception here.


When faced with a well organised opponent block, De Ligt’s lack of creativity and vision shows clearly. Without his bread-and-butter fullback pass, he looks lost and plays it safe. Don’t be surprised to see such scenes when faced with good EPL mid blocks

In summary of this section, I find De Ligt’s progressive stats to be a very wrong picture of his actual line-breaking ability especially from the point of view of aiding central progression for the team. It’s just not something he has in his locker.

Short pass progression: 4/10

2D) Long pass progression

The long pass version of our previous section.

If you guessed that this is another way in which De Ligt racks up easy progressive passes without actually being progressive, you would be right. The only difference is that the larger-distance passes that count as progressive in this case are – ones to the opposite side fullback!

Here’s a clip summarising this and the previous section. 2 passes that both count as progressive but are essentially safe passes to both fullbacks that didn’t really help the team break the block but instead just play around it without penetrating

I still like the fact that he attempts some switches and long balls when he has good time and space, but largely speaking there’s nothing very creative or actually progressive here

Long pass progression: 6/10

In conclusion to De Ligt’s passing section, I feel he has a good hold on secure passing that rarely gives away possession, but he racks up progressive passing stats with many basic passes to his fullbacks that don’t actually help his team progress.

Our scorecard so far looks like:

  1. Carrying

I’m covering all aspects of ball control from a CB’s first touch to long-distance dribbling in the carrying section. A vital tool in a defender’s arsenal is the ability to break lines via carrying and this is another trend modern football has been going towards with the top managers desiring carriers from deep to disrupt opposition shapes and create spaces.

3A) Close control

In this part, I’ll be analysing De Ligt’s first touch and ball manipulation to set himself up for his next action. Essentially, how he receives, scans, turns and gives himself the room to pass or carry after that.

I find no issues here. De Ligt has a very neat and experienced first touch. He kills power neatly and is able to quickly manipulate the ball for the next action as well. Here’s a sequence with 2 such quick moments. 


Very few issues with this trait.

Close control: 8/10

3B) Carrying under pressure

An extension of the previous segment, but with the addition of intense opponent pressure and judgement of the variety and distance of the CB’s dribbling out of such situations. With increasing finesse of pressing patterns across teams, being able to carry under pressure and help the team progress is now a vital trait for a modern CB.

De Ligt struggles under pressure. His go-to move when charged is actually to hoof it long. He doesn’t have the agility or dribbling technique to wriggle his way out of such situations or beat his man or carry into a safer space and give himself time for the next action. He usually uses a 1-touch move when pressed. 

Like an aimless clearance.

Or a first-time pass without risking a turn or carry.

At best, he is able to push the ball into space and use his power to escape situations if the angle of reception and opponent pressing direction is convenient to do so.

All in all, I see this as a major gap in De Ligt’s game as well. He is not press-resistant, simply put. You can expect a safe pass-back or clearance if De Ligt is under pressure. The saving grace is that he rarely loses the ball in dangerous areas thanks to his awareness of his limitations.

Carrying under pressure: 4/10

3C) Carrying in space

What does the CB do when the opponent isn’t pressing and sitting in a deeper block and his team needs him to venture into space aggressively and either bait a press or put himself in a good situation to disrupt the block? What does the CB do when his teammate has baited an opponent and played the CB in the space created?

De Ligt’s carrying in space is basic. When provided with the opportunity to dribble, he is able to do so without much speed or skill. But he’s able to bridge spaces and pull off actions after that. Often this means a dribble forward from RCB and pass to RB. Basic stuff. Like the progressive passes, this is also how he racks up many of his progressive carries.

Even when space is created via build up on the other side and presented to De Ligt, he’s rarely able to take advantage due to lack of speed, vision and forward-thinking. Often he gets those RB/RCM spaces to carry into and help destabilise opponent blocks but is unable to make much of it. Imagine a Rudiger or Bastoni or Gvardiol in these kinds of situations.

Again, I wouldnt call this trait a strength by any means. De Ligt is unable to take opportunities when space is created for him because he lacks the drive, dribbling power and positivity to make the most of it. But it’s nothing negative since he does use space decently and aid the team in passive ways. For this trait, average at best.

Carrying in space: 5/10

That closes our carrying section. Here’s a summary of all sections and traits so far:

  1. Others

4A) Fitness

Just one look at De Ligt’s appearances across years makes it clear how (not) available he has been.

In his 8 senior years so far, De Ligt has crossed 40 starts in all competitions only twice. His average is 31 90s per season which roughly correlates to 55-60% availability. And at least for the last 7 of those years, De Ligt has been the trusted starter at the club.

The next logical step is to look at his injury record.

Barring 21/22, De Ligt has had at least 3 different injuries in every season of his last 6. The worst part is that 23/24 seems to have been his worst yet with 4 different injuries in 4 different parts of the season. Such kind of continuous interruption in his playing time affects his consistency and the team’s as well. His fitness isn’t reliable.

My bigger worry is the trend for players who start their careers early and play a lot before the age of 21. Their injury issues and fitness concerns catch up faster than others. De Ligt racking up 136 appearances as a teenager goes against him in this regard, even as impressive as it sounds. The increase in injuries he’s had in recent years points at a worrying arc and it could even be one of the reasons Bayern were willing to sell him despite not actually having any major problems with his attitude or performances.

De Ligt’s fitness isn’t reliable and I’m not confident it gets better as he ages.

Fitness: 4/10

4B) Mentality

The final section of this report is on De Ligt’s personality. We cannot complete a report without touching upon the person he is, beyond the player he is. Here are some anecdotes that highlight his mentality:

  • De Ligt after winning the 2018 Golden Boy (the first defender to ever win the prize) and Kopa Trophy for the best U21 player on the planet a year later: “When you win the Golden Boy [award], that gives some pressure. But as a player, you have to love the pressure. Because it says you are something good. Seeing it this way gives me some space in my head.”
  • De Ligt on being named Ajax’s youngest captain when Ten Hag handed him the armband in March 2018: “I was growing into that role. I became more confident and realised I could make a difference. That really helped me develop, also mentally.”
  • De Ligt on Erik ten Hag’s influence: “The most important coach for my development. Even at 18, he saw me as someone who could lead a team, who could lead by example, who could be a good captain.”
  • De Ligt on knowing his own limitations: “You couldn’t ask me to dribble past opponents and score or to play the perfect pass every single time. I know that I can do it sometimes, but it’s not my natural skill. My natural quality is to be always focused, to be ready to fight, to lead, to try to be as consistent as possible, instead of trying to show everybody what I can do (on the ball).”
  • De Ligt on what makes him a good defender: “With my power and pace, I can dominate opponents, but I’m not one of those defenders who can simply outrun everyone. I’m relying a lot on the mental side of the game. My biggest strength is reading the game and anticipating what’s happening.”
  • De Ligt on self-assessment: “It’s a constant battle of becoming a better player. Every season, I want to be better than the previous one. It’s good to look at certain numbers — how many sprints, how many duels won — but a lot of stuff that defenders do doesn’t show up in the stats. I want to feel confident, I want to feel dominant.”

The reason I stuck to De Ligt quotes to build an image of his personality is because he is an extremely self-aware, humble and honest person. The points I mentioned about De Ligt knowing his limitations as a footballer stem from this mentality. It’s what makes him efficient and reliable at what he does well. There are very good reasons he was captain at a young age and has continued leadership responsibilities at future clubs since.

Mentality-wise, we are getting a superb character who will enrich the dressing room.

Mentality: 9/10

Our final scorecard for Matthijs De Ligt reads:

Final thoughts and Manchester United fit

I’ve seen people compare De Ligt to Harry Maguire but I think there is a better and more apt comparison to quote. He comes as a replacement for Raphael Varane and I think he shares many characteristics with Varane too –  a good leader, a great box defender, aerially strong, physically imposing, a good reader of the game and safe without being progressive or creative in possession. 

How does this fit at Manchester United? 

The likeness with Varane and from what we’ve seen early in this season so far hints at us continuing the tactics from last year which are a good fit for De Ligt. As a box defender and reactive CB, De Ligt is good while his ability to progress via wide channels is a fit with our focus on wide or direct progression instead of short central progression. 

Given De Ligt’s lack of agility, carrying and two-footedness, I think the RCB role would suit him best. Maguire has also been picked for the RCB slot. Lisandro Martinez plays in the LCB slot exclusively but has never managed more than 60% availability in a season. This leaves Yoro, who simply as a by-product of his age and the above dynamics, might end up playing more LCB in his initial time at Manchester United. 

For the 24/25 season, what we might see is:

RCB: Maguire, De Ligt

LCB: Lisandro, Yoro

But as Yoro develops, we might see more of Yoro-Martinez start while one of Maguire or De Ligt might suffer. The general feeling seems to be a Maguire sale leading to a LCB buy (Branthwaite possibly).

But another point is that any evolution in the tactics will leave De Ligt behind rather quickly. He might struggle to contribute in a high line progressive system that focuses on short build up. So, a lot depends on our tactical evolution and the manager’s future. I think De Ligt is a good fit for our current tactics under our current manager, but any evolution or change in either might not go well for him. That said, his awareness of his limitations and positive traits might always make him a good squad player regardless of what happens. His age of 25 means that there is still scope for recouping a fee in the near future even if things don’t go as per plan. Until then, Manchester United fans can enjoy the best of The Leader.

Hope you enjoyed this read. If you’re here from anywhere else do follow me on Twitter. Let me know your feedback and thoughts there.

(Stats credits: fbref.comtransfermarkt.com)

MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – AUGUST 16: Matthijs de Ligt of Manchester United during the Premier League match between Manchester United FC and Fulham FC at Old Trafford on August 16, 2024 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)

Leny Yoro: The Wall

On 18th July, 2024, Manchester United completed the signing of 18-year-old defender Leny Yoro from French Ligue 1 side Lille for a fee of €62m plus a potential €8m in add-ons. Yoro has joined United despite interest from Real Madrid, who opted against engaging in a bidding war with the Premier League club for the centre-half.

The prospect of snatching a highly rated teenager from Real Madrid’s attention already makes this signing a very interesting one, while the high fee for an 18-year-old also raises a few eyebrows. In this article, I will uncover every aspect of Yoro’s profile in great detail and score each of them (attempting a new scorecard system this time, hope you like it).

Career history

A Lille academy graduate, Yoro became one of the youngest first-team players to make his professional Ligue 1 debut at the age of 16 years and 6 months. After a first senior season in which he was mainly used as a rotation player (10 starts and 5 subs in 22/23), he became one of Lille’s regulars in his second full season (30 league starts and 9 cup starts in 23/24).

Scout Report

  1. Defending

Yoro is a defender, so this is where we will start the report. I’m going to break the aspects of his defending into five distinct parts. In each part, I’ll explain the trait I am measuring, show some examples of it via match footage and then rate Yoro on that trait.

1A) Pressing

I am defining all forward defending actions as pressing. In a nutshell, any action where Yoro has to step up the pitch to engage is counted here.

I find Yoro to be an excellent presser. His sense of awareness ahead of him combined with his good reach and long legs often mean that he sees the danger and quickly steps up to intercept or tackle. He can do this consistently in a game and it is one of the main avenues in which he constantly stops opponent attacks or wins the ball back. 

Lille often played a high line to support a high press under Fonseca and this suited Yoro well as it gave him licence to step up and intercept before attackers could receive the ball. One pattern where this often plays out is when a team tries to seek their central attacker via a long ball or grounded progressive pass and Yoro steps up in a timely fashion to win the ball.


I wouldn’t say Yoro is an aggressive stopper and we will see why when discussing the other defending traits, but in moments where a quick interception ahead of a clear opponent attacker is possible, Yoro has the awareness, jump timing and reach to nick the ball off cleanly.

This is an aspect Yoro scores well on. I think there are the odd risks of pressing forward and getting beaten, which Yoro sometimes takes since he is confident of recovery, which is why I’m cutting 2 marks. But largely speaking, this is among Yoro’s consistently reliable traits.

Pressing: 8/10

1B) Box defending

I am defining all backward or deep defending actions as box defending. Actions where Yoro has to drop deep close to his box to engage or defend while tracking back.are covered here. I’m also including the cover play actions of positioning and sweeping behind the line in this section.

Let’s start with the good bits. Yoro is a good sweeper. He has the composure to drop behind the line, read the play and then use his speed and reach to mop up loose balls.

I think Yoro’s acceleration is decent, but it’s his top speed that’s excellent. Which is why when he has a view of the scene from a deeper position and is on his side of the goal to the ball or player, he has the speed and reading advantage to win the ball consistently.

Even on occasions when he’s just in time or reacting from a slightly disadvantaged position, he is able to extend his long legs and win the ball in time. A debate is to be had on how often Yoro goes to ground, but often in the box when he has read the situation well and is in advantageous positions, it’s a successful action.

Now for the not-so-great parts. When faced with a dribbler in a sequence where he is running backwards, Yoro struggles. The cons of his immature body control show up in such situations and he often does get leg-tied as a result. This is an area dribblers can take advantage of if they have evaded his initial pressing action and are in good distance to force him to engage. In these situations of disadvantage, Yoro’s tendency to go to ground does more harm than good.

Yoro also has the odd concentration mistake when he’s defending deep in his box. He can get better at being aware of blind side and diagonal runs. I’ll put this down to age and inexperience, since it doesn’t show up often, but there are times when a well-timed run simply ghosts past a ball-watching Yoro.

I am also not a big fan of Yoro’s engagement when opponents approach from wide. He often fails to stretch or make himself wide and block the incoming shot or cross. We will look at this issue more in the next defending section, but this is a reason Yoro fails to register too many blocks when box defending. Most of the blocks are the ones from central areas, but from wide areas he regularly displays a weakness in making himself big to intercept cutbacks, crosses and shots.

In summary of this section, while there are things to like about Yoro’s sweeping, reading and cover play, his reverse engine defending, block defending of wide approaches and the odd concentration mistake on smart opponent runs, make this one of his traits to improve more on.

Box defending : 6/10

1C) Channel defending

I am defining all sideways or wide defending actions as channel defending. Actions where Yoro has to drift sideways to engage or defend while tracking an opponent on the wing.are covered here. This often happens when his fullback steps up and the opponent player attacks that space, so it is also related to playing in a high line and high press setup which Lille often did.

The issue I mentioned before of how Yoro allows crosses when engaging wide shows up in a larger way here. When he’s pulled to the flank and faced with a dribbler who can also put in a pass from that position, Yoro does not do enough to use his good reach to block the pass. He has the physique and often displays similar feats in central scenarios, so it’s purely a question of habit and probably a relaxed attitude.

The good news is that Yoro’s reading of the game and speed to cover space shows up in wide defending, which is why his engagement rate is solid. He covers ground quickly to get in the face of the opponent player on time. But the question comes in how he engages after that. Since the play is away from the box and he’s often stopping a dribbler from getting to the byline, Yoro goes to the ground a lot more often in these situations. When it works, it looks exciting. When it doesn’t, it looks clumsy and often leads to a foul.

We have spoken about the pros of Yoro’s lanky physique, but not the cons. Being so thin and mobile also means that Yoro lacks power and muscle, at least as of now. This means that his upper body strength is still not developed enough. This issue shows up in wide defending moments. When engaging side-on with a dribbler who has good balance and can ride contact well, Yoro can be prone to being outmuscled. Shoulder-to-shoulder running situations result in Yoro being barged away far more easily than top center-backs should. This could be another reason Yoro relies on a quick sliding tackle since he feels he can’t win a direct upper body power battle.

In summary of the channel defending section, while Yoro’s awareness and coverage ensure he travels well to wide areas, the ways he engages in can be improved. If it’s the same side winger, Yoro doesn’t do enough to cut off the cross. If it’s a powerful dribber, Yoro can be outmuscled or forced to go to ground which has a 50-50 success rate at best. All in all, there are more negative scenarios than positive ones when Yoro defends wide, as of now. I would call this a big area of improvement, even though the potential is there.

Channel defending : 5/10

1D) Aerial duels

More self-explanatory section, I am defining all duels with an opponent in the air as an aerial duel. Basically, a header contest. I’ll also be covering uncontested headers and attacking headers in this section. I won’t be covering aerials in any other section.

You would assume Yoro’s height and awareness make him an aerial duel monster and you wouldn’t be far from the truth. He had an aerial win % of 64% last season (as per fbref) which puts him in the top 20 percentile of Ligue 1. Yoro regularly wins his aerial duel fairly easily and has the jump and reach to support his height.

But one small issue is that Yoro’s lack of upper body power shows up again here. He is rarely able to manage a powerful aerial clearance. It’s often a weak looping clearance that doesn’t travel far.

To his credit, Yoro manages this by exercising control over power. His height and technique allow him to be in control of the direction of the header, which means that he is often able to head the ball to a teammate or clear it to a comparatively less dangerous area.

But if Yoro is central and deep then neither can he pick out a pass in a crowd nor head the ball far away enough for the danger to be thwarted. In such situations the ball often ends up around the box and doesn’t relieve pressure on his team. I would merge these specific instances with box defending issues since the worst scenarios correlate with when his team is deep and Yoro is central in a defensive block.

When it comes to attacking set pieces, Yoro’s combination of height and aerial control are a big advantage. His lack of power is not an issue, since he’s able to use the power of the delivery to guide the ball towards goal. Yoro regularly out jumps his marker and gets his header shots on target in attacking set piece situations. He has 2 goals from set pieces in his one regular season in 23/24, but I feel he has potential to get more in a year given his traits. This would be a good pro to help solve Manchester United’s set piece woes in an age where most teams are only maximising set piece impact every year.

In conclusion to the aerial defending section, I don’t want to be too harsh, since Yoro’s height, awareness and control mean that he often wins his duel and pushes the ball to a teammate or less dangerous area or shot on target depending on the situation. The few times his lack of power gives away the ball in a bad area occur only when he’s deep and central and should be fixable as he develops upper body strength.

Aerial defending : 7/10

1E) Ground duels

I am defining all duels with an opponent on the ground as a ground duel. Basically, a classic isolated 1v1. This often occurs in transitions versus opponent dribblers running at Yoro or when the high line has been breached to isolate an opponent attacker vs Yoro.

I’ve seen most online discourse on this trait and there is a lot to unravel here. I have covered some 1v1 duels already in channel and box defending, but let’s take a deeper look here.

Yoro’s approach to ground duels is on the passive side. He keeps a distance from his attacker and buys himself time to study their movement before engaging in a timely manner. I think he does this to avoid going to the ground early or being taken out when he is adjusting his body. He prefers to trust his reading of the game, speed and reach to tackle in a timely manner when he has an advantage. This approach does seem sensible for this body type.

When faced with a squared-up and aware Yoro in his path, an opponent is forced to dribble wide to create separation and get out of Yoro’s range. This is when Yoro decides to stretch to win the ball or execute a clean tackle. It is Yoro’s I-got-you moment.

But as we’ve discussed before, him going to ground isn’t a failsafe move. Even in the times when he gets the ball, his ability to retain control of it after having slid in cannot be guaranteed, which results in the ball remaining in a dangerous area or being re-controlled by the opponent. In this case, Yoro’s teammate had to mop up the free ball after Yoro couldn’t get it under control even after a well-timed sliding tackle.

Another issue comes during the period when Yoro is keeping his distance and monitoring the opponent. A side effect of his developing body control, Yoro can be prone to manipulation during this waiting phase, especially when faced with a tricky dribbler with quick feet. We saw before how Yoro can get leg-tied when assessing a 1v1 for the timing to dive in. This coupled with his low upper body strength means that he can be beaten even before he engages by an opponent who doesn’t allow Yoro the right separation and distance with constant quick feet.

In summary of the ground duels section, Yoro can be prone to manipulation when 1v1 with an opponent which can force him to get unnerved due to low body control or going to ground early. But this is easier said than done and will require good timing from a good dribbler. In most other cases Yoro’s wait-and-tackle approach does yield good results. Yoro’s approach to ground duels is similar to Van Dijk, but he still lacks the Dutchman’s power and body control to resist going to ground and track and outmuscle his opponent regularly.

Ground defending : 6/10

That concludes our defending section. Here’s a snapshot of our scorecard so far.

  1. Passing

In modern football, a center-back’s abilities on the ball are as important as off it. Especially, for a top team that is expected to keep the ball more often than not and break down opponent blocks regularly. In this section, I will analyse Yoro’s passing traits.

2A) Pass security

Let’s start with the basics. Is Yoro a secure passer? Is he able to handle many passes and ensure they safely reach their target? Does he ensure possession security in the build up phase of his team? Does he position himself in a good area to receive to help his team protect the ball and keep moves going?

I found the answers to most of these questions positive. Yoro’s pass-and-move game is solid. He retains the ball well with clean crisp passes to his GK or fellow defenders.

He has a good understanding of passing angles and is able to shift his body and execute passes where he wants, showing good understanding of the game and technical execution.

I would also like to point out his good positioning in possession. I find him a lot more switched-on in build up about where he needs to be to give his teammates passing angles to ensure progression and safety. See how he runs to take up a good passing option for his GK in the below sequence.

In conclusion, I don’t find any issues in this section. The reason I’ve cut 2 marks is strongly correlated to the next section, so I’ll explain myself there.

Pass Security : 8/10

2B) Pass empathy

“Passing the ball is communicating with another person; it’s being in the service of another person. It’s crucial. For the pass to be a good one, the player has to put himself in the position of the person who’s going to receive it. It’s an act of intelligence and generosity, what I call technical empathy.” — Arsene Wenger.

The above serves as a good definition of pass empathy. Is the power, speed, spin and direction of your pass putting your teammates in good positions for their next action?

I do see some issues here with Yoro. A combination of his laidback attitude and still-improving technique means that he often miscalculates the power needed in a pass.

I’ve seen this happen more than once a game to wave it away as random one-offs. Especially when many of these mistakes happen when Yoro is not under any pressure and has time and space to pick out his intended target.

In other cases, this lack of technical empathy manifests as an overhit pass. Notice in the below example, like the first, how the ball is also bouncing a little instead of being a crisp on-the-ground trajectory. It seems trivial, but these moments make life easier/tougher for your teammates.

Yoro’s pass empathy needs improvement and this is also the reason I cut 2 marks in the pass security section. He does have the odd mistake when passing even without pressure deep in his half to a clear target. It’s nothing ground-breaking but there is a scope for improvement if he wants to become an even more secure passer who puts his teammates in good positions consistently.

Pass Empathy: 6/10

2C) Short pass progression

A progressive pass is a forward pass that attempts to advance a team significantly closer to the opponent’s goal. Different stats providers have different ways to measure this stat. 


Anyone visiting fbref will notice that Yoro’s progressive passes stat is in the bottom 20 percentile for Ligue 1, insinuating that he’s not progressive enough. In this section and the next, I will look to debunk that claim by splitting progression into 2 parts – short and long progression. The former deals with how Yoro progresses using short grounded passes.

From the stat, you would think that Yoro does not attempt any central line-breaking passes, but this couldn’t be further from the truth. Often from central areas, Yoro looks up to find a pivot player with a clean pass that breaks the first line of the opponent team’s high press. These passes don’t get added to the progressive pass stat because of the short distance.

These CB to DM passes are often followed by a quick circuit that creates space for a teammate to drive into. So I would argue that even if the specific pass Yoro plays doesn’t count as a progressive one, it is often the first in a sequence of passes that helps the team create space to progress into. In that sense, him attempting these passes instead of a safe sideways one is key.

I have also noticed a good disguise pass on some occasions where he opens up his body aiming at a wide pass, but closes it quickly to slide in a central one. Again, the technique is all there and he just needs to up the numbers.


He also has a nice grounded pass to a dropping attacker, so there is no question on his execution, especially when it comes to line-breaking passes that aid central progression.

But all said and done, these are clips of what he CAN do and does on occasion. He still has some ways to go to become a regular line-breaker. He mainly loses out on stats because of the short length of his passes. He doesn’t attempt many passes beyond the quick central ones. For eg. There are times he could have released his same side fullback in space but didn’t. Improvement in his tactical intelligence, passing range and courage to attempt more will be needed to call him a truly progressive passer.

Short pass progression: 6/10

2D) Long pass progression

The long pass version of our previous section. I’ll keep this brief for a simple reason – Yoro doesn’t attempt many long passes. 

This is one gap in his game. I had to see many games to see him pull off a basic switch in space to the opposite side of the field. He also fails to attempt longer passes on the side of the pitch he is on. This is one reason he misses out on a lot of progressive stats that other CBs rack up regularly. 

(Yoro compared to Ligue 1 CBs in 23/24 as per fbref)

Again, I really don’t see any technical gap in this trait. It simply boils down to him noticing the opportunity and trying to develop himself. I feel like he limits his vision of himself to a short-pass-and-move player which is largely a good thing, but prevents him from seeing long pass opportunities, which are also vital for a team to progress up the pitch or get out of trouble.

Lots to improve on this trait. No need to sugercoat it.

Long pass progression: 3/10

In conclusion to Yoro’s passing section, I feel he has a good hold on short passing which makes him good at retention and small-length grounded passes. But there is a lot of scope to improve his passing range, vision, long ball attempts and technical empathy.

Our scorecard so far looks like:

  1. Carrying

I’m covering all aspects of ball control from Yoro’s first touch to long-distance dribbling in the carrying section. A vital tool in a defender’s arsenal is the ability to break lines via carrying and this is another trend modern football has been going towards with the top managers desiring carriers from deep to disrupt opposition shapes and create spaces.

3A) Close control

In this part, I’ll be analysing Yoro’s first touch and ball manipulation to set himself up for his next action. Essentially, how he receives, scans, turns and gives himself the room to pass or carry after that.

I’m a big fan of Yoro’s close control. The combination of his lean agile body, technique and awareness shows clearly in every ball reception. He is neat in his actions and displays high calmness and composure regularly.

Even when the pass to him is hit with power or has an awkward bounce, Yoro’s rate of reception and close control remains consistently good.

Very few issues with this trait.

Close control: 8/10

3B) Carrying under pressure

An extension of the previous segment, but with the addition of intense opponent pressure and judgement of the variety and distance of Yoro’s dribbling out of such situations. With increasing finesse of pressing patterns across teams, being able to carry under pressure and help the team progress is now a vital trait for a modern CB.

Yoro has a nice turning radius which he often is able to showcase when pressed. Again, a combination of awareness and his agile frame aids good technical quality. And all of this is possible thanks to his composed nature. He is unfazed under pressure.

Yoro is a great small space player mainly thanks to his excellent fine touches. Every touch and turn is calculated and crisp. And they not only help him beat the first line of opponent pressure, but also put him in good positions to pick out a good pass in the space created. He has the make-up of a progressive CB.

Again, the caveat comes in the form of actual volume and consistency of actions. Yoro CAN do it well, but doesn’t as often as a top team would want to see it. I feel he can be a lot more aggressive and decisive in his carrying under pressure to make more of his talent and help drive his team forward. But the talent is all there.

Carrying under pressure: 7/10

3C) Carrying in space

What does Yoro do when the opponent isn’t pressing and sitting in a deeper block and his team needs him to venture into space aggressively and either bait a press or put himself in a good situation to disrupt the block? What does Yoro do when his teammate has baited an opponent and played Yoro in the space created?

An example where the GK baits the opponent press and releases Yoro in space around the RB area. Yoro has the ball control, drive and speed to dribble into space until another opponent is attracted, which leads to the next forward pass. A good example of progression.

I like Yoro’s speed – both speed of thought and action. Even after a defensive action like an interception, he has the agility to drive into space and pick a good pass which is a valuable trait to counter immediately.

As always, my major concerns for this section are volume and range of actions. Yoro doesn’t attempt enough dribbles into space and doesn’t try long distance brave ones that break lines clearly. They’re mostly short carries that bypass one opponent. A lot of his passing and carrying actions feel limited due to his notion of being a great small space player even though he has the physique and technique to expand his zone of influence.

Carrying in space: 6/10

That closes our carrying section. Here’s a summary of all sections and traits so far:

  1. Others

4A) Fitness

Yoro is a very fit player. Here’s his injury history as per transfermarkt and his appearance data as per fbref:

Understandably, there’s not much to analyse for a player who turned 18 last December. He’s just had one minor injury and played 90% of his club’s games in the 23/24 season, once he obtained key starter status.

That said, I would hope his playtime isn’t as extreme at Manchester United in the early years. We have seen the perils of teenagers being overplayed at a young age and Yoro is already coming off a season that would have been straining for a 18-year-old. I would expect some gametime management in these initial years to limit his appearances under 35 90s per season. But from the look of things, he looks like a fit profile.

Fitness: 9/10

4B) Mentality

The final section of this report is on Yoro’s personality. We cannot complete a report without touching upon the person he is, beyond the player he is. I find that the best quotes about a player come from the staff and teammates who spend most time with him. So here are a few examples.

Paulo Fonseca (Yoro’s Lille manager): “It’s not normal to have an 18-year-old player like Leny with this maturity and the technical qualities he has. For me, he will be one of the best central defenders in France and probably in Europe. He is very balanced and there is no doubt that he will become a very great player.”

Jean-Michel Vandamme (Director of Lille’s training facility): “He had an accelerated learning process because he only spent two years in the training centre. ‘Leny has the ability to learn quickly. He wants to do it and has a real interest in analysing different situations, understanding them, while putting controlled pressure on himself.

Rémy Cabella (Lille senior player): He has all the qualities and the potential to do something huge. He is very humble and that is another of his strengths.”

Angel Gomes (Lille key player, ex-Man Utd): “As soon as he arrived in the group, I understood that he was going to reach the top. ‘When I discovered the pros at the age of 16 at Manchester United, I understood that it was different. He already had the right temperament and that’s not normal for a 16 or 17-year-old player who arrives. It’s as if he was already an experienced player. And it showed in his way of training, his way of behaving. His progression was obvious.”

Thierry Henry (Lille’s coach for the Olympic Games in Paris): “To impose himself at Lille as he is doing… He always has some moments of [being] a youngster, and that is quite normal. It comes slowly, you make mistakes and sometimes you take hits.”

So in summary of these quotes and a few others I have read, a few things stand out:

  • Humble and willing to learn
  • Mature beyond his years with a balanced temperament
  • Analytical and is able to learn quickly
  • Age-appropriate mistakes but has high potential

I don’t feel the need to add too much to this list. It’s a good takeaway of his mentality. The lack of experiencing pressure and expectations at the highest level is the only reason I’ll cut marks.

Mentality: 8/10

Our final scorecard for Leny Yoro reads:

Final thoughts and Manchester United fit

In summary of the entire report I’d say that in possession, Yoro is technically very capable and the base for that is his top tier close control. But I feel he’s still in his shell of a small-zone player and limits his volume and range of actions to a compact area. My take is that as his experience increases, his vision, tactical intelligence, courage and range of actions will all improve to close these gaps. I don’t see any physical limitations that prevent him from becoming one of the best ball–players in the world.

Out of possession, Yoro still has to nail his defending style. He is passive in nature to avoid early cases of going to ground or getting beaten, which makes channel defending and ground duels tricky, but his awareness, speed, height and range are solid, which make him good at covering, pressing and aerial duels in the short-term, while providing a good base for the rest to improve in the long-term. My take is that as his upper body and body control develop, he will be able to lean more on his strength and awareness, avoid risky duels and make it much tougher for opponents to get past him.

(Photo by Manchester United/Manchester United via Getty Images)

How does this fit at Manchester United? 

A tough question. At his current state, Yoro is a good pass-and-move small-zone player in possession who would benefit from a team-wide proactive defending style, while paired beside a stopper partner so that Yoro can reduce committing early and high or wide. I’m not sure if United are currently there yet, but my take is that it fits with the eventual direction the club wants to go towards. Lisandro Martinez fits the partner dynamics and I’m assuming United want to go towards a progressive high line and short build up style of play, even if the current system isn’t there yet.

With all that in mind, I would say Yoro is a signing for the future. Both in terms of his current ability and also Manchester United’s current tactical prowess. Yoro needs development but might just be ready in time for United to be ready to play a game that suits him as well. But until that time comes, I would call for patience. This means limiting his gametime via smart rotation and reducing expectations and pressure on him. The onus on coaching both for his development and for the team’s tactical evolution are high. But the good news is that if both happen as planned, Manchester United could have an elite centre-back in their ranks.

Hope you enjoyed this read. If you’re here from anywhere else do follow me on Twitter. Let me know your feedback and thoughts there.

(Stats credits: fbref.com, transfermarkt.com
Image credits: Manchester United, Getty images)


What is Erik Ten Hag’s philosophy?

We’re 2 years into the Ten Hag era. And while there are trophies to show, there are some big questions around the gameplay and ideal vision that need answers.

Firstly, the fact that we often see massive drop offs when we are missing first-team players begs the question:

1. 𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑝 𝑖𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑, 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑝 𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 & 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑?

There are many teams that stick to their style of play & core philosophy regardless of players available or opposition faced. Brighton didn’t play many usual starters against us, but we all knew how they would play. It’s the same for City, Arsenal, Barcelona etc. Even Spurs.

But if the argument is that we cannot execute certain tactical elements with backups but we can with starters, then the answer to that question seems to be:

“𝑂𝑢𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟𝑠.”

Eg. If the argument is that we can build up short & play through a press only if some players start, else we will have to go long, then this means that the build up is very reliant on the problem-solving ability of those players & not on coached patterns that everyone can execute.

It’s noticable. Licha & Shaw are great problem-solvers in build up who can carry/pass out of a press better than anyone else in the squad. When both don’t play, we struggle in 1st phase progression. This is also the main reason why ETH isn’t a fan of rotation & dropping his best players in general. Which in turn leads to other issues like injuries, tiredness and ignoring of backup-level players.

While it’s normal for teams to upgrade & get better players, relying on monster/unique player ability to solve tactical gaps instead of patterns of play isn’t a good sign. You’re always at the mercy of many external factors like injuries, form, opposition quality, gamestate etc. The lack of practice of the ideal plan means that even when most players are fit like vs Spurs (Mount, Licha, Varane, Antony, AWB, Shaw started), we often went long to bypass build up & rely on counter-press to create, while our high press was figured out within 20 mins & was played through easily all game.

Its’ hard to predict which Manchester United will turn up in a game. This extreme variation comes from dependency on players over patterns. A philosophy is something that can be executed consistently. It’s efficiency & success may vary based on factors, but the very nature of the tactical intent won’t fluctuate wildly. Which brings us to our next question.

2. 𝑊ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑇𝑒𝑛 𝐻𝑎𝑔’𝑠 𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑦?

What is that well-defined idea that we constantly see on the pitch game after game & envision a clear path to success (treble-aiming seasons) with?

My guess is that ETH’s philosophy is on the lines of:

‘𝐷𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑤𝑖𝑛’

His biggest strength is the flexibility & pragmatism to change things to suit the players he has & get the best out of any situation that the team is in. It’s a good trait to have in a manager. It is the main reason for the 22/23 season’s impressive results & served us well for year 1. But in the long-term, is it a boon or a bane?

ETH’s pragmatism seems to stem from reliance on certain players for certain game-breaking actions. He might ask his teams to pass through an opponent press if it contains a monster passer like Blind, dribble through it if it has a monster carrier like Frenkie De Jong or simply abandon build up & go long if it has neither. There are examples of each case in his career. He’s mentioned in multiple pressers that his players need to think for themselves & go long if the short option isn’t there instead of losing the ball in build up. We’ve seen 1 of the world’s best build up GKs in Onana playing long in the last few games including vs relegation-battling teams and lower league opposition.

ETH seems too content to take those hits. He’s not idealistic enough to feel hurt at not being able to play in a certain way, like a Pep/RDZ/Ange would. ETH’s ability to discard an approach based on player traits leads to constant sacrifice on how his team should ideally play. A philosophy isn’t built like that. The ideal state of having all players fit & happy in a perfect environment will never come. Not at a club like Man United anyway. The idea of management is to work through ever-changing dynamics & deliver sustainable & repeatable performances.

3. 𝑆𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡’𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛?

There probably isn’t any solution as such. Such era-defining philosophies don’t crop up overnight (if at all). But we might have to start viewing Ten Hag’s United with a certain set of assumptions:

A) Manchester United’s gameplay & approach will fluctuate wildly based on available players, opposition, gamestate & other external factors. Big away games may always be a struggle & rely on a reactive approach rather than a proactive approach.

B) Manchester United’s gameplay will rely heavily on game-breakers. Build up masters, press monsters, carry mechants, 1v1 specialists – such profiles of high quality/ceiling become important to dominate games due to the lack of coached patterns. Recruitment importance goes up.

C) Manchester United may never be a league title challenger. Probably, my bigger concern compared to (A) and (B), such flexible state-based approaches work well for knockout competitions where you can adapt & thrive. It is a big reason why we went deep in cups in both years. It was highly enjoyable to see us defend compactly and shut down Man City to win the FA cup, but does anyone actually think that the final win gives us a template to play an entire league season in a similar manner versus all opposition? A dominant league side is built on the basis of a clear philosophy where a team’s various XIs can consistenly outplay all opponents across a year. Man City are a good example, Liverpool were under Klopp & Arsenal are currently close – consistent playstlyle & resistance to player rotation drop offs.

Final thoughts:

Combining A, B & C, I get the impression that if ETH does succeed at United, it will look something like Madrid under Ancelotti/Zidane – flexible tactical approaches based around high quality well-rounded players with more success in cups compared to the league. ETH’s pragmatism & lack of idealism could be his greatest weakness. He might win many games & even trophies but his wish of building a consistent treble-aiming dynasty will be tough until he doesn’t define an unshakable philosophy to stick to regardless of external factors.

How to get the best out of Lisandro Martinez

In this article I will cover:
– Licha’s strengths, weaknesses & traits
– Suitable tactical roles in & out of possession
– Pros & cons of each

Lisandro’s strengths

  1. Build up ability – Positioning sense to show or create lanes for others + close control to recieve, turn & carry
  2. Progression – Passing range & technique to progress into attacking half
  3. Duels once locked – Pressing, intensity & physicality esp on ground

Lisandro’s weaknesses

  1. Defensive coverage – Low span, agility & speed to defend across large distances
  2. Aerial duels – Avoidance of aerial duels & failure when attempted
  3. Aggression – Tendency to lunge, over-press or over-commit to try & win proactively to paper coverage issue

I think strengths are obvious to anyone seeing Licha regularly but let’s talk a bit on weaknesses. His short stature & lack of burst make wide or channel defending a struggle – a reason ETH doesn’t isolate Licha wide at LCB vs opponent attackers by committing our LB to the high press.

Which is why when there are large distances to cover or dribbling attackers to stop, Licha often goes to ground or overcommits in a bid to win the ball proactively & not get forced into a turn-and-run race towards his own goal. It works many times but at other times, it’s costly.

With this understanding of Licha’s profile, I have 2 suggestions for how he can be used long-term to bring out his strengths & limit his weaknesses. The good news is that ETH’s usages of Licha at Ajax & Man Utd also indicate both options. Let’s go over them with match examples.

1. Lisandro as central CB in possession

ETH has many build up patterns but back 3 is common to reach desired 3-1-6 shape. Licha as CCB can avoid channel defending, dictate build up & find attackers via short & long passes. Only issue – defending central transitions/crosses.

Between a LB who tucks in (Blind at Ajax, Shaw here) & a RCB who defends channels, Licha has the cushion to progress the game from CCB. His speed of thought & execution on the ball usually means he’s the one to get us out of our half with a sharp pass even against pressing teams.

Whether it’s incisive ground passes between the lines to CM/CF or switches to winger/FB, Licha has the range to dictate from CCB. But needs composure & positioning to not lunge when oppo dribbler runs at him in transition + handle target men CFs aerially. Which brings me to…

2. Lisandro stepping up to pivot in possession

He has the press-resistance & playmaking power to dictate from midfield. This move also keeps him away from the back 3 in the 3-2 rest defence. His ground duel prowess, pressing & intensity might even be a better fit for pivot 2.

We saw this tried in pre-season like vs Madrid. Licha stepping into pivot makes good use of his ability to carry, switch or play vertical passes to the attackers. It also reduces the pressure to defend channels & aerials. Might even suit Licha’s proactive pressing & ball-winning.

But this has a few issues like the 3 below. Demands a lot from rest of the team to be setup suitably, needs Licha to be composed anyway, requires a suitable DM partner & will require both FBs to tuck in. Might need time, coaching & recruitment to perfect.

I’m expecting “What about inverted LB?” Might work in possession since its similar to 2nd option of dictating from pivot, but out of possession, places Licha at LB vs pacey/dribbley RWs. Inverted FBs like Zinchenko, Dalot, Cancelo & Udogie have the pace for that. Licha doesn’t.

In summary, I think ETH already has the right idea to limit Licha’s gaps & use his strengths in central areas. CCB role is consistent while CB->CM was also attempted in pre-season & game 1 vs Wolves. As better conditions emerge (fitness, buys, confidence) we might see more of it.

Erik ten Hag’s biggest weakness – Rest defence

In this article I’ll cover:

— The importance of rest defence
— Manchester United’s structure & issues
— Top team examples
— Potential solutions

What is rest defence?
Based on the German Restfeldsicherung, rest defence refers to the defensive structure that “rests” (remains) when a team is in the attacking phase. Basically how a team attacks knowing they can defend transitions when they lose ball
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru3KcF6OCNc

Example below. When red team attacks they leave the deeper 5 in a narrow shape that can prevent central transitions of blue team when possession is lost. This either leads to red team winning back ball or blue team being forced wide giving time for red team to drop into a block.

You’ll often see shapes like 3-2/2-3/3-1/2-1 mentioned for rest defence but just like build up notations these are vague. More important is shape, timing, width & height of structure. Here’s an episode of me & 2 experts talking rest defence with examples: https://x.com/GetFootballEU/status/1719772354803351911

Manchester United defensive stats ranked in EPL 23/24 (as of Jan 2024):
Shots conceded: 16th
Shots conceded distance: 12th
NPxG conceded: 16th
NPxG/Shot conceded: 15th
Shot-creating actions conceded: 16th

Our defence has been abysmal & a large reason is the poor rest defence structure.


Whenever we enter the attacking phase we start to take aggressive shapes like a 3-1-6 commiting numbers forward or wide to aid progression or counter-pressing in higher areas. When the ball is lost this leads to an immediate counter in acres of space vs few players to defend.

Let’s look closely at the Billing goal conceded in the 2nd half vs BOU. LB Reguilon joins the attack leaving Shaw-Maguire-Dalot in a situational back 3 in possession. Bruno & Scott mostly park high or wide to aid the attack, leaving Amrabat as lone DM ahead of the back 3.

But when Bruno drifts wide & Amrabat moves into the LHS channel to recieve Shaw’s ambitious pass, the center is vacant. In the moment the ball is won, BOU have beaten all midfielders & have a run at a recovering back 3. A 3v3 which leads to switch+cross for an easy header goal.

Here against Gala, we’re high in a 3-1-6. This time AWB as the RB has license to join the attack as Shaw-Maguire-Lindelof form the back 3. Amrabat is DM. In the moment we lose the ball, Amrabat charges to counter-press (instructional, Casemiro did this a lot too) vacating center.

Again Gala have a run at the space ahead of the 3 with Amrabat, CMs & AWB tryng desperately to catch up. 2 issues in the back 3: (a) They dont press to compress space when ball is lost (b) Maguire tries to step up creating a gap which is where next Gala pass is played. Bad sync

Another BOU example. This time play’s on the left side as Garnacho has dropped wide & deep to help progress while Scott has also drifted to the left to recieve from Bruno. A poor pass from Scott leads to a BOU interception & counter. The issue is Shaw having stepped up a lot.

Shaw’s step up, Reguilon’s deeper position & Maguire’s attempt to cover creates a huge space between the 3. Again, a very disjointed shape where Solanke can run & receive into. He’s goal side with space in one easy pass. Saved by the post & no United player was even close.

Another BOU example. The ball is lost by Garnacho very high & wide in their half. Should be easy, right? Amrabat has pushed high to the left to support the attack. He’s closer to BOU’s RB when they win the ball. The massive gap between him & back 3 is noticed & ball played there.

With Dalot inverted, Reguilon wide & Amrabat high, the 2 CBs are deep creating a massive gap for 3 BOU players to enter, control an aerial ball & release the pass. A 3v2 situation almost. In the end, a good Maguire tackle saves the day but another poor rest defence episode.

Summary of our rest defence gaps:
— High vertical gap: Deep back line + midfield drifting high/wide for progression/press
— High horizontal gap: Spread-out back 3 (again to aid wide progression)
— Smaller vertical gaps: Lack of sync/strategy between defenders to step up or cover

Opponent benchmark
Before solutions, let’s look at how our top team rivals do it. Here’s an example from Arsenal vs Spurs from this season. Odegaard loses the ball in the RHS when 5 Arsenal attackers have entered Spurs final 3rd. Spurs want to counter immediately & find Son.

RB White is narrow in possession while Saliba has drifted wide to check Son. The LCB & LB are there for cover & DM Rice is also backtracking to support. They’ve blocked the center as a unit & forced Spurs wide. Son can only pass centrally by which time Rice & others recover.

Here’s an example from City vs Liverpool this year. City have a different setup where a CB steps up into pivot. Here LCB Akanji is up with DM Rodri when City have the ball. When ball is lost, they congest the center forcing Liverpool wide. RCB Dias engages Nunez wide on flank.

RB Walker ideally forms the back 3 but seeing Dias step wide he charges to dissuade Nunez at first before taking up a central position to cover for Dias. By the time Nunez is forced back, Rodri & Akanji have recovered, Walker cover enables Dias to press & win ball as Nunez delays

Were ten Hag’s Ajax better in this regard?
Not quite. It happened lesser coz of league quality & Ajax having better in-possession controllers. But the principles were largely the same. To support an aggressive 3-1-6 even the lone DM would press high when possession was lost.

Here DM Edson pressing high to support the front 5 (which has both CMs) means that the 2 CBs are backtracking alone in acrres of space with the RB closest to helping out. A 3v3 situation that is thwarted in the end by a last ditch Lisandro tackle. Very similar to us currently.

Solutions to improve
Structural:
1. Better timing of rotations: Eg. If DM goes to LW to help, RCM drops deep
2. Playing a synced-up higher line: Push up line & step up together to compress space or catch offside
3. Prioritize center: Delay opponent by forcing wide

Good example:

Recruitment:
1. Buy defenders who can defend channels: In above examples, what Saliba & Dias offered vs Son & Nunez enables a high + aggressive rest defence
2. Buy space-covering midfielders: Casemiro coverage papered cracks last year. 1-2 similar young profiles for OOP needed

And one last thing. I think 3 big differences from the 22/23 season were:
1. Casemiro was in good form papering the cracks
2. Defence line was lower and in good box defending form
3. We didn’t press so high to leave space in midfield when midfielders backed the press

Thank you for reading. Follow me on Twitter if you don’t already. Feedback and engagement there is appreciated!

Verified by MonsterInsights